HomeAbout UsGrantsFormsNewsroomHelpContact Us
Search NIFA
Advanced Search
Browse by Subject
Agricultural Systems
Animals & Animal Products
Biotechnology & Genomics
Economics & Commerce
Education
Environment & Natural Resources
Families, Youth & Communities
Food, Nutrition & Health
International
Pest Management
Plants & Plant Products
Technology & Engineering

NEWS RELEASE

USDA To Assess Environmental Benefits of Conservation Programs

Contact:
Wayne Baggett (202) 720-4623
Sylvia Rainford-NRCS- (202) 720-2536
Sean Adams-ARS-(301) 504-1622

WASHINGTON July 22, 2004 - Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman today announced a five-year effort to study the collective environmental benefits of government conservation programs on agricultural land.

 “The advantages of conservation programs are widely recognized, from reducing soil erosion and enhancing water and air quality to promoting wetland and wildlife habitat preservation and restoration,” Veneman said. “However, the environmental benefits of these programs have not been previously measured at the national level. This effort will provide an accounting of the benefits achieved through conservation programs.”

Through the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) the Department of Agriculture will study the environmental benefits of conservation practices implemented through 2002 Farm Bill programs: the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, Wetlands Reserve Program, Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program, Conservation Reserve Program, Conservation Security Program and Conservation Technical Assistance.

CEAP is composed of two basic parts: a nationwide assessment of conservation benefits and more in-depth studies of these benefits in 20 selected watersheds.

The national assessment will be reported annually starting in 2005. USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service’s (NRCS) National Resources Inventory will be used as the sampling basis for estimating the environmental benefits of conservation practices, as well as farmer surveys and existing USDA computer models.

In-depth studies within eight special-emphasis and 12 benchmark watersheds will occur simultaneously with the national assessment and other on-going watershed research efforts. NRCS selected the special-emphasis watersheds to address specific concerns such as manure management on animal feeding operations, water use on irrigated cropland, drainage management, wildlife habitat and riparian restoration. These watershed studies also should help develop performance measures for estimating soil quality, water quality and wildlife habitat benefits for specific conservation practices.

Special Emphasis Watersheds

Location

Primary Conservation Issues

Choptank River

Maryland

Poultry manure management

Maumee River-Upper Tiffin River

Michigan

Dairy manure management and subsurface drainage

Maumee River-Upper Auglaize River

Ohio

Subsurface drainage

Upper Snake Rock Creek

Idaho

Irrigation management

Cheney Lake

Kansas

Wildlife habitat and beef cattle manure management

Upper Klamath Lakes

Oregon

Irrigation management

North Bosque River

Texas

Dairy manure management and reservoir water quality

Stemple Creek

California

Dairy manure management and riparian restoration

USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) has been conducting research on most of the 12 benchmark watersheds for a considerable period of time and anticipates that watershed-scale research and assessments will be continued over many years.

Benchmark Watersheds

Location

Primary Conservation  Issues

Beasley Lake

Mississippi

Fertilizer management, pesticide management, wildlife habitat, and riparian restoration

Goodwin Creek

Mississippi

Tillage management, wildlife habitat, and riparian restoration

Little River

Georgia

Tillage management, pesticide management, and riparian restoration

Mark Twain Reservoir

Missouri

Fertilizer management, pesticide management, tillage management, reservoir water quality and surface drainage

South Fork Iowa River

Iowa

Fertilizer management, swine manure management, tillage management, and pesticide management

St. Joseph River

Indiana

Fertilizer management, pesticide management, tillage management, reservoir water quality and subsurface drainage

Town Brook

New York

Dairy manure management, streambank fencing, and reservoir water quality

Upper Big Walnut Creek

Ohio

Fertilizer management, pesticide management, reservoir water quality and subsurface drainage

Upper Leon River

Texas

Dairy manure management and reservoir water quality

Upper Washita River

Oklahoma

Fertilizer management, irrigation management and rangeland health

Walnut Creek

Iowa

Fertilizer management, pesticide management and tillage management

Yalobusha River

Mississippi

Wildlife habitat and riparian restoration

In addition, the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service in April 2004 issued a notice to accept applications for competitive grants for additional CEAP watershed studies.

Additional information about CEAP can be obtained at www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/nri/ceap.